We are searching data for your request:
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Livius.org describes the Uruk King List, translating it and also listing what years those kings are believed to have ruled (from other sources). In the list, it says Antiochus I Soter ruled for 22 years according to the Uruk King List, but he is conventionally known to have ruled only 20 years, from 281-261 BCE.
Why does the Uruk King List say he ruled longer, and why don't we accept that number?
Look at the footnote in the linked edition. It says "[Twenty-two years is probably a scribal error.]"
The "King list VI" gives the correct number "20"; see here: